News Article

Is Canada ready for a North American Union?

By Giuseppe Gori, WorldNetDaily.com

Read the complete article

Excerpts:

...the right to free speech is limited by a federal quasi-judicial commission for "human rights" and similarly named commissions in every province across the country. These commissions have the mandate of limiting free speech across the country. Individuals and organizations now forced into silence are closing sections of their websites and refrain from writing opinions on homosexuality, in light of the increasing number of cases of prosecution...

Because of the Canadian restricted freedoms and appalling state of democracy, it seems that a union of the U.S. and Canada would be more difficult than expected.

With the prospect of a "North American Union" becoming a subject of conversation, most Americans are worrying about the effect an open border with Mexico would have.

But what about Canada?

Most Americans know very little about their big neighbor to the north. Is it feasible to have an economic and/or political union between the U.S. and Canada? Americans may realize that there is a large number of Canadians who despise American foreign policy. Furthermore, most Canadians would have nothing to do with American-style health care and are proud of their country's liberal values. The education system in Canada is almost completely public (even "separate" education is paid by taxpayers) and has become an instrument for government indoctrination of "Canadian values." Americans know that Canada's institutions are a residue of the old British loyalist powers the U.S. patriots fought 200 years ago. Has Canada changed? Isn't Canada now a democracy?

The distribution of powers

The essence of the U.S. Declaration of Independence is that it provides a philosophical basis for a government that exercises its legitimate power by the "consent of the governed." It defines the condition of a free people, whose rights and liberty are derived from their Creator. The U.S. Constitution then was developed consistently with the creed of human liberty proclaimed in the Declaration.

On the contrary, Canadians never fought for independence. While a "Charter of Rights and Freedoms" was enacted in 1982, the Canadian Constitution is essentially the same as written by the British in 1867.

The Canadian Constitution Act assigns all "powers" to the federal and provincial governments, from the "legitimate authority of parliament over public property" to raising taxes by "any mode or system of taxation," from the "establishment and management of hospitals" to the "solemnization of marriage."...

This opposite understanding of "the hierarchy of power" is probably the main cause of the difference in attitude between Americans and Canadians with respect to government. But there are more fundamental rights and freedoms that Canada should be required to address before it can be part of a North American Union.

The independence of the judiciary

Canada's judicial power, at all levels up to the Supreme Court, is not independent from the legislative power. The Canadian Supreme Court judges, for example, are appointed for life by the prime minister. In the U.S., judges are either elected or, at the highest level, have to undergo confirmation hearings.

The principle of separation of power is an essential element of representative democracy. The independence of the judiciary is a criterion for judging whether a country is a dictatorship or not. The separation of powers is an essential element of the Inter-American Democratic Charter. The direct appointment of judges by the legislators would make any student of democracy cringe!...

In addition, on the basis of the Canadian "Charter of Rights," judges of the Supreme Court have in practice acquired the power to "legislate," instead of being guarantors of the law against injustice.

Freedom of the press

The Canadian Radio Television Commission, or CRTC, regulates the "content" of Canadian media by imposing "Canadian culture" and thus excluding from the free airwaves American TV stations, conservative TV programs (such as Fox News) and religious TV and radio stations (such as EWTN). It has consistently refused broadcasting licenses to "single religion" broadcasting (such as Radio Maria), because of a requirement for multi-faith programming content.

The independence of the media

Important concepts, such that the media should be free, independent and be a watchdog of government, are understood by most Americans.

These ideas are lost in the mind of Canadians. The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation is a media conglomerate, paid with taxpayers' money, whose top positions are appointed by the government.

All other national media are owned by either Canwest Global or CTV Globalmedia. The first conglomerate, owned by the liberal Asper family, includes Canwest Global Communications (owners of the Global Television Network, the Toronto Star, the National Post, the Southam Newspaper chain and the largest Canadian internet portal: Canada.com). The second conglomerate includes the other national newspaper (The Globe & Mail) and national television networks, including CTV and the A Channel. There are no major independent or conservative papers, magazines (the Western Standard closed down recently), television stations or radio stations....

Freedom of religion

Most U.S. citizens understand the independence between state and religion. In Canada this is interpreted to mean that government officials should leave their conscience at home. Some "scholars" even questioned whether a religious person should be allowed to run for public office.

Churches in Canada have been "granted" by the government "charitable status," which allows them to issue official tax receipts and allows them to pay no property taxes. Both of these "privileges" have been used recently to threaten members of the church who dare to have a different opinion from the government in social matters...

Freedom of speech

Very similarly, the right to free speech is limited by a federal quasi-judicial commission for "human rights" and similarly named commissions in every province across the country. These commissions have the mandate of limiting free speech across the country. Individuals and organizations now forced into silence are closing sections of their websites and refrain from writing opinions on homosexuality, in light of the increasing number of cases of prosecution of individuals and organizations by such commissions....

Right of self-determination

The Canadian electoral system, contrary to the U.S., uses a simple plurality system to elect members of parliament which determines indirectly who sits as prime minister, the most powerful position in the country. There are no direct elections for the prime minister, the premier of each province, the senators or the judiciary.

The frustration of electors is reflected in turnouts at election time that barely exceed 50 percent of the eligible voters....

Concentration of powers by the prime minister

The Canadian prime minister (an unelected position) appoints the governor general, the cabinet, the Canadian senators (yes, and these are life appointments), the Supreme Court judges (also life appointments) and appoints more than 5,000 other positions in government agencies, boards and commissions....

Because of the Canadian restricted freedoms and appalling state of democracy, it seems that a union of the U.S. and Canada would be more difficult than expected.

Read the complete article.

Fair Use: This site contains copyrighted material, the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of issues related to national sovereignty of the United States. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information, see: www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode17/usc_sec_17_00000107----000-.html.
In order to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.